*SIGH* It looks like Brian got really pissed off at yours truly. After quoting a fellow Christian (Cory Tucholski) who has been worried about my tactics (funny how this same Christian has problems with Brian too), Cutler writes:
It would seem instead that Frank Walton embodies the stereotype of the immoral Christian who would lie and cheat for Jesus.
I can see why Brian would flippantly calls me a liar without backing that up. I mean, c'mon, that's Brian, you know. But I never lied about Brian. If I did I would like to see proof. On the other hand, he says I cheat. Cheat? Cheat in what exactly? I never cheated in my life. (I wonder though if Brian cheated on his pregnant girlfriend with Kelly). And I never cheated when I tried to debate Brian. All he does is run from me. I want an honest debate with the nincompoop, but he won't take me up on it. Oh, well. But I find it hilarious that a man (ie Brian Cutler) would accuse me of cheating when he's practically open about how he cheats Christians in debates.
Let me deal briefly with what Cory was quoted as saying though:
I don’t want this to turn into an anti-Frank Walton ministry, but I thought that I would offer up one more post on why his “ministry” is not a Christian one.
First, the new poll on the side. He asks for the best word to describe Brian Sapient. The choices are less than Christian ways to describe any individual.
The Bible never described lazy people (that's a word I used for Brian)? He is definitely lazy. And very sexually perverted. That's why I used the word "pervert" to describe him.
And, the Bible is filled with strong language. For instance, Jesus and John the Baptist have used phrases like "brood of vipers" to describe people. Jesus was no softy.
While Sapient and I disagree ideologically, a small part of me wishes that I had the ability to devote my life full-time to my writing and ministry. Sapient has the opportunity to do that, and he seems very driven at his activism. I suppose, therefore, the word I would choose to best describe Sapient is “driven.” I think it fits better than the choices that Frank has offered up.
*SHRUGS* Yeah, okay, Brian is driven. So, what? I don't believe for a second he believes the things he says though. He's saying outrageous stuff just to get attention. That way, maybe he can find a sponsor that will give him money. That's all he's about. All Brian does is spend over 40 hours a week in front of the computer screen. He is not the father of his child, he used his ex-girlfriend, he lied about Kent Hovind's son banning him from youtube, while Brian likes banning people from youtube, he intimidates Christians by saying he'll sue them for all the money they have (yes, obviously, he has to do it for money, huh?), he has children exposed to skanky sluts half-dressed in his videos, etc. What more is there to say about Brian Cutler? He's a loser.
***UPDATE***
I love it when Brian responds to me. He keeps digging a deeper hole for himself. This is what he just wrote in his blog:
=================================
Just for kicks...
Posted on December 4th, 2007 by admin
www.briansapient.com/blog/?p=37
I rarely indulge him, but this one was the elusive self pwn and I had to, just had to point it out…
Fran quotes me…
“It would seem instead that Fran embodies the stereotype of the immoral Christian who would lie and cheat for Jesus.”
After quoting me, he says…
“On the other hand, he says I cheat. Cheat? Cheat in what exactly? I never cheated in my life.”
Do you see me say the words “Fran cheats?” I was making an inference. See how it could have been more honestly represented?
The elusive self pwn strikes again.
=================================
Well, all I gotta say is, Thank you, Brian, for admitting that your "inference" was unwarranted to begin with. I guess that really means I'm not a cheater then. Thank you.
LOL!
Brian, dude, you're so easy to figure out!
***UPDATE***
Brian looks for more pain. He writes:
=================================
Just for kicks II
www.briansapient.com/blog/?p=38
Posted on December 4th, 2007 by admin
“Do you see me say the words “Fran cheats?” I was making an inference. See how it could have been more honestly represented?” - Sapient
“Well, all I gotta say is, Thank you, Brian, for admitting that your “inference” was unwarranted to begin with. I guess that really means I’m not a cheater then.” - Fran
See just for kicks part 1 for the elusive self pwn. Did you see me say my inference was unwarranted? Do you see how Fran could have been more honest representing what I said?
One of my favorite quotes from Jake is,”The hardest thing to do in life is to see things as they are, not as you want them to be.” Theists see things as they want them to be in matters of gods, not as they are. Seeing things as you want them to be rather than how they are is dishonest to the one person that matters the most, yourself. It’s sad to see when humans let this dogma taught by religion funnel over in to other unrelated areas of their life. Like how to treat their wife, their children, themselves, etc. Losing sight of how things are, rather than how you want them to be is somewhere at the core of all the people who have killed in the name of religion.
=================================
My reply:
See just for kicks part 1 for the elusive self pwn. Did you see me say my inference was unwarranted? Do you see how Fran could have been more honest representing what I said?
You first said,
It would seem instead that Fran embodies the stereotype of the immoral Christian who would lie and cheat for Jesus.
Which I replied with,
Cheat? Cheat in what exactly? I never cheated in my life.
Then you said this to save face:
Do you see me say the words “Fran cheats?” I was making an inference.
The funny thing is, even if it was an inference that doesn't mean I was wrong. Because inferences are deriving conclusions based on facts. Well, if I cheated Cutler would have given us the facts. But he didn't. So, by definition his inference was unwarranted! Thank you, Brian, for leaving that opening for me to exploit :o)
One of my favorite quotes from Jake is,”The hardest thing to do in life is to see things as they are, not as you want them to be.” Theists see things as they want them to be in matters of gods, not as they are. Seeing things as you want them to be rather than how they are is dishonest to the one person that matters the most, yourself. It’s sad to see when humans let this dogma taught by religion funnel over in to other unrelated areas of their life. Like how to treat their wife, their children, themselves, etc. Losing sight of how things are, rather than how you want them to be is somewhere at the core of all the people who have killed in the name of religion.
Well, as we've seen that's not my problem. But speaking of how one treats their children, Brian, dude, last I heard you have no custody of your son. Besides, you aren't even an example to him. All you do is make these perverted videos laced with cussing in it. Is that how you want your son to be? You are not the father of your child. And you certainly weren't no example to the mother of your child. You used her and her money! I'm sorry you can't see how lazy and immoral you are, Brian.
LOL!
Does Brian really try to think things through before typing?
0 comments:
Post a Comment