Sunday, September 30, 2007

Daniel Dennett takes the blasphemy challenge



Well, whupdeedoo. Anyway, technically, Dennett did not say "I deny the Holy Spirit" so he didn't take the blasphemy challenge. At least according to the "geniuses" at RRS you have to literally say "I deny the Holy Spirit" to commit blasphemy (but we know that's not really the case).

For those of you who are wondering, Rich Rodriguez was the one speaking to Dennet. This is the same Rodriguez who chumped out of a debate with me.


Related:

Blasphemy Challenge

"You are delusional Winston" (Rational Response Squad)



"After we end religion we'll be working on ending jealousy. That should keep us busy til we die."

The Rational Response squad

They make an interesting statement about kicking and screaming Theist fighting against being "cured". Interesting words I have heard so many times in history. Ironic, is it not?

Footage from 1984 (BBC 1954)

by Ashetheraven


Related:

Brian Cutler should resign.

What do RRS believe about Christians?

What would RRS like to do to Christians?

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Good Ol' Rook Hawkins getting owned on the Jesus Myth

Kabane52 takes on Rook Hawkins here. As of this writing, Hawkins has not answered the question yet.

It probably won't be long before RRS bans Kabane52 from their forum, all because he's giving Hawkins a beat down.


Related:

The stupid mind of Rook Hawkins
Rook Hawkins will not debate JP Holding fairly.
Rook Hawkins gives cowardly excuses not to debate JP Holding.
Rook Hawkins caught plagiarizing!
Rook Hawkins caught misusing a source with Thomas Thompson!

Friday, September 28, 2007

Atheist Jihad 4 - CSE

RRS has been posting this video all over the place at their website:



If CapnOAwesome (above) knew what he was actually talking about, he'd know that RRS are known for getting Christians banned from youtube, too. Why won't he criticize them for that? Not only that but CSE is on record for saying that they are not responsible for RRS's banning from youtube. But it's people like CapnOAwesome who so desperately want to rid theists they would go to any lengths doing it, even by being dishonest.

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Youtube pulled CSE Videos. www.cseblogs.com

Brian Cutler continues his hypocrisy about Kent Hovind and the DMCA. But Butch (a Christian) did some research and found the following:



Brian Cutler's reply:



It's interesting how Brian Cutler is still trying to blame Kent Hovind and CSE for his suspension at youtube. It's obvious he's using Kent Hovind to gain more popularity.

Butch replies: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4

RRS - I Got The Pills!

Brian Cutler continues his rant that theism is a mind disorder despite his dishonesty about it (which he hasn't even bothered replying to. Figures, huh?):



Uhm, those who don't have a sense of humor is a sign that they have a mental disorder? It looks like Cutler likes making up his own definition on mind disorders. But what else is new?

Still, more and more atheists have gone against Brian Cutler:



Hey Brian,

Keep up the "theism is a mind disorder" bit. You're only hurting yourself anyway.

Frank

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Greydon Square threaten to shoot somebody on school campus!

Arrested!

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Brian Sapient caught in a smoking gun lie!!!

Well, the Wesein video in this post has been removed. Perhaps, Brian Cutler had something to do with it. But basically, Cutler was caught saying that most (and not all) theists have a mind disorder. In this video Brian Cutler said this,

(21:31)

And we're gonna continue to remind people that theism is just like a delusional disorder and it should be listed as such. Most theists contain a grandiose delusional disorder.


Why would Cutler say that most Christians have a mind disorder when he said that whoever has God-belief automatically has a mind disorder? Shouldn't it be "all" people have a mind disorder then, and not "most"? You see, Brian Cutler knew he was wrong all along about theism being a mind disorder. I think it's hilarious he got caught with his own words in his mouth. Intuitively he knows in his heart of heart that theism is not a mental disorder. So, why is he saying theism is a mental disorder anyway, if he knows he's lying? Because Cutler wants attention. And like most stupid narcissists he'll say anything idiotic to get it. He'll even lie to his listeners. This is the smoking gun proof, Brian, that you contradicted yourself about theism being a mental disorder.

Welcome to Operation Spread Eagle!



Who are the RRS to talk about censorship when they censored a Christian and had him banned from youtube? Heck, at one time they threaten to sue me for copyright infringement! Also, someone ought to teach RRS how to edit, because that video sucked!

Response to a few critics over the last week.



A few thoughts:

Look, we all deny Brian Sapient because we know he is really Brian Cutler. So, there's just no use going through that whole bit. And basically the Righteous Response Squad and the blasphemy challenge, well, that's pretty much old school. Besides, you can checkout our blogsite against the challenge where we prove once and for all that Sapient doesn't even know what he's talking about when it comes to blaspheming the Holy Spirit. Anyway, Cutler babbles on about the same criticisms he's already dealt with before. Having him deal with it again is just a waste of time. This whole video was long, boring, tedious, and filled with hypocrisies and self-contradictions. Even WeiSein (a non-Christian) caught Cutler in a smoking gun contradiction:





LOL! Since Cutler said "most" something tells me he knew he was wrong all along about theists having a mind disorder. Mr. Cutler, you done got caught being dishonest!


PS Oh, excuse us, Cutler, you thought that melsbasket was not stupid but you thought she had a mind disorder. Who would have thought that those two terms were really any different from the other?! No wonder you hated on fakesagan who clearly whipped you.

Re: "Maybe you should stick to asking questions."

In response to Jerome's video, Brian Cutler said this:



Brian Cutler,

You said, "Maybe using 'maybe' is sh*tty logic." Then why did you continue to use "maybes" after making that statement? And if "maybes" are sh*tty logic, why did you make a suggestion and title your video "Maybe you should stick to asking questions"? Maybe you ought to think things through more. Maybe you, Rook, and Kelly were never ever honest about Christianity to begin with. And maybe "maybes" actually makes you think more, Brian. It can help you think in hypotheticals. Maybe you ought to stop contradicting yourself, and maybe you should start making better videos.

Frank

Brian Sapient should resign his position (paid or not)

Another non-Christian comes out against Brian Cutler:



According to Ashetheraven here, Brian Cutler is a "Eric Hovind" atheist. No kidding! Man, Brian Cutler is getting hurt from all sides after his time against Melsbasket.

New account, censorship, Melsbasketcase

Brian Cutler overreacts to this video and responds here:



Melsbasket has been schooling RRS and Brian Cutler as of late (dude, she rocks!). In fact, she was the one who provoked Cutler so much, it lead him to say that theism is a mind disorder. She's been driving Cutler so crazy that he has lied about her filing a DMCA. Brian, dude, are you deaf? She said from the very beginning she wasn't. But you can tell from this video that Cutler was nervous. Something tells me he's hiding something. Way to go, Melsbasket! Either way, let's have a "file a DMCA" challenge! If Cutler ever uses footage from you, file a DMCA. If Cutler threatens to counter sue you for that, let him. It's complete bull. And the chances of the lawsuit going through is small (nothing came of the lawsuit Cutler filed against Geller and Hovind... nothing!). So file as many DMCAs as you can and let the RRS go through the trouble of reinstating their youtube account. Personally, I think that would be funny.

Chaotheist (a different kind of atheist) responds here and here.

Melsbasket responds here and here.

Monday, September 24, 2007

brian sapient is a petty, megalomaniacal demagogue

Fakesagan is not a Christian yet he rips Brian Cutler a new one on this "theism is a mind disorder" fiasco (Warning: there is profanity):





Personally, I think this is old news, having dealt with this "theism is a mind disorder" stuff before with Brian Cutler. I've asked him again and again if he went to a psycho ward, since he use to be a Christian. Well, he hasn't answered me yet. You see, if Christianity is a mind disorder and Brian use to be a Christian, how did he deconvert? Hmm, I guess he went to a psycho ward to cure himself from Christianity then. Personally, I think that Brian is still mental.

Related:

Theism is not inherently a mind disorder
The RRS is a stupid disorder
Theism is a mind disorder?

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Open Letter to Rational Responders

Part 1
Part 2
Part 3

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Suck it Jesus



My own thoughts of Kathy Griffin is this: why did she have to praise herself for her award in spite of Christians who thank God? Couldn't she just say, "I thank nobody but myself for this award and that's it!"? Nope, she just had to insult Christians, huh? Anyway, here's what fat ass has to say...



Dude, Brian, were you on drugs while you did this video? You looked like you were on something. It's like your hair (with what little of it you have) had a cat fight. Anyway, my review of this video segment...

Brian suggests if there's a God, only He would take credit, not anybody else. I don't see how that follows at all. God made this world in the first place. How can't we thank Him and the people He gave us? To me, it seems perfect sense given a Christian worldview.

Who do the atheists have to thank? Nobody but themselves. Okay, fine, but what is an atheist in the first place but a man made in the image of blind, random, and mindless nature (or a blind, random, and mindless spaghetti monster). At least Christians are made in the image of God! And so we have some sense of gratitude.

LOL! Brian J. Cutler received a free autograph from Richard Dawkins for his "hard efforts." Well, Jiminy Jillickers! I can get a free autograph by Richard Dawkins by simply going to a book signing. Whew, that's hard man! But "hard efforts"? Brian, dude, what hard efforts? Is it really hard to get someone to speak in your momma's house? Wwoowww! That's an avalanche of hard effort! Also, you rely on your girlfriend to pay the bills, and you lived in your mommy's basement, and you rely on the donations from your shallow-minded organization. I don't see how "hard work" or "hard effort" fits in there at all. Uhm, Jesus had nothing to do with that? *SHRUGS* Probably not. The question is, why would Jesus have anything to do with having a nincompoop speaking at your mommy's house?

Friday, September 21, 2007

Theism is a mind disorder?

video

It's no surprise the Rational Response Squad would use Albert Ellis since he's just as stupid as they are. Apparently, RRS throw out Albert Ellis' name like he's some kind of authority. But does Albert Ellis think his own thoughts and words are true? Or that they must or should be followed? Probably not. You see, Albert Ellis is a postmodernist. He does not believe in absolute truths and is on record for that!

It begins with his book, Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy:

"I clearly (and strongly) began to realize the primacy of people's Jehovian musts and saw how they usually underlay their other dysfunctional beliefs." (p. xvii)

Well, Jiminy Jillickers, Dr. Ellis! Must we believe what you say about "musts"?

And here's the smoking gun:

"REBT* agrees with the postmodernists that there is no objective standpoint from which to judge whether something is an absolute truth...we can temporarily grant that for practical purposes one knowledge is probably 'better' than another knowledge." (p. 406)

And yet more examples:

"As far we can tell, there is no certainty, perfection, nor absolute truth in the world...we live in a world of probability and chance, and we can be certain of nothing external to ourselves." (p. 129)

So, I guess if Albert Ellis thinks that theism is a mental disorder we can't say that that's an absolute truth. All in all, Dr. Ellis contradicts himself if he thinks there is absolutely no absolute truths. He believes it's illogical to hold "absolutistic musts and shoulds" (p. xvi). Yet he absolutely rejects such absolutes, and suggests we must not have musts, and we should not have shoulds!

You see guys, Dr. Albert Ellis is stupid. And it's no wonder the Rational Response Squad look highly upon him. And if there's anybody who has a mind disorder, it would have to be RRS for believing this crap!


=================================

* - Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy. The Rational Response Squad endorse REBT.

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Rook Hawkins on Pontius Pilate



Paul MacFarland wastes Rook Hawkins here:

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Togetherforpeace, GoldenGun85 and other RRS Christian haters


Some of those questions asked on the screen have already been answered by Paul Manata months ago here. And Cutler cowered away from replying. He never ever addressed them. Cutler dodged straight-forward answers to his questions. In other words, (not that it needs mentioning) Cutler is too close-minded to hear any answers. He has too much faith in his atheistic worldview.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Re: Brian Sapient Called Me!



Here's Brian Culter's response to Togetherforpeace ("Jack") and GoldenGun85:



This is easily one of the most shameless acts done by Brian Cutler. And it may possibly be the most dishonest piece of video I've seen by him. Also, on a personal level, the nerve of Cutler deliberately trying to ruin Jack's character is sickening to me.

And notice that Brian Cutler looked away from the camera time and time again. This tells me he knows he's lying. He looked like a criminal on the hot seat.

But aside from all that, compare Jack to Brian Cutler. And it's overwhelming obvious to see who the real rational and open-minded and moral and civil person is.

Brian,

You are a piece of work trying to ruin the reputation of a stand up guy like Jack. Jack is easily the coolest and most moral person I met on the net. He tried opening an honest conversation with you, only to have you ban him from your website. Also, he saved his friend from being exploited by you. Obviously, that angered you so much you looked for mounting ways to slander Jack. When you couldn't find anything you resorted to lying about him. Jack saw you for the fraud that you are but voiced his opinion about you with grace. You know deep down in your heart that Jack is right about you. And it hurts, doesn't it? I'm glad it does.

Hugs and kisses,

Frank Walton

Monday, September 17, 2007

Cutler goes to the dollar store...



Well, Jiminy Jillickers, Brian! If you're saying that if something was not originally meant to be, should be stricken from the record, why not bring back prayer in school, then? We had prayer in school even while Darwinian evolution was taught in them! Heck, even before Darwinian evolution, our children were taught creationism. Should we bring that back then and do away with evolution?

Sunday, September 16, 2007

My response to "The only Frank Walton post you will ever need to read."

Brian Cutler and Rook Hawkins write about me here:

"The only Frank Walton post you will ever need to read."

My replies...



Regarding Thomas L. Tompson's letter I replied here.

Regarding Greydon Square's song "Addressed" I responded here. Also, some of you should know that Square has been apprehended after nearly doing a school shooting!!!

In response to http://frankwaltonchronicle.blogspot.com...

This blogsite is authored by none other than Ted Bell who has been pretending to be me all over the net, while saying some rather unsavory things, like I enjoy homosexual rape and that I like to molest children. You can read about him and what he's done here. He also likes to pretend to be my friends, like Tino Huggins and Corey Washington, why, he even likes to imitate atheists like Aaron Kinney and (get this) Brian Cutler. The funny thing is, Brian Cutler and Rook Hawkins knows that this author is spreading lies about me, but they don't care. Just as long as someone is trying to ruin my reputation by any vicious and irrational means it would satisfy them.

In response to...

Frank Walton is Violent - Well, I'm only violent in self-defense. But it seems like Brian Cutler is scared of violence. Yeah, I always knew he was a pansy.
  • Threatens Austin Cline - I never wrote that, it was Ted Bell.
  • You're Gonna Die Bitch! - I never wrote that, it was Ted Bell.
  • Lets Kill! - I never wrote that, it was Ted Bell.
  • Frank Threatens a Woman - I never wrote that, it was Ted Bell.
  • Dance on your Head - I never wrote that, it was Ted Bell.
  • Even More Threats - I did write that here. But I don't see how telling someone "if they want to fight I'd be more than happy to oblige" strikes me as a threat. Knight laughed at the idea that my life and my wife's life has been threatened. And for that I told him if he wants to fight one-on-one I'd be happy to do that. Of course, he's too scared to take me up on that offer.
  • More Threats - Yes, I wrote that, too. But how is it a threat to say if "Knight wants to fight me I will accept his challenge"?
  • Frank Threatens a You-Tuber - Yes, I wrote that, but, again, how is it a threat to say if he wants to fight I'd be more than happy to go "UFC" on him?

And...

Frank Walton is his own Imposter - This is Brian Cutler's desperate way of showing that all those things Ted Bell wrote about me were actually written by yours truly.
  • Frank slips up again - I never wrote that, it was Ted Bell.
  • Busted Once Again! - I never wrote that, it was Ted Bell.
  • Imposter Really? - LOL! That's great! I think these comments are proof positive that they weren't from me. I never wrote it, it was Ted Bell. My profile number is 12126023605395414714, genius. Profile number 15975507689047753908 is my impostor. LOL! Brian, dude, you're stupid... and gullible.

I'd like to thank Brian Cutler and Rook Hawkins from the bottom of my heart for mentioning me at their website. As much as they try to hurt me, paradoxically it only ends up hurting themselves. Still, they won't provide their readers links to my blogsites so they can get the whole story. Still, they'll continue to believe Ted Bell's on-going lies about me. Seems like Teddy has a crush on me, eh? But hey, if that's the best RRS can do against me, then have at it.

Saturday, September 15, 2007

Who are the Rational Response Squad?

RRS consists of 3 members: Brian Sapient, Kelly, and Rook Hawkins*. And they're here to "cure" the mind disorder known as theism.

Brian Sapient - Sapient's real name is Brian J. Cutler. He only has a high school education. He has no college degree. He has no professional or academic training in religion, philosophy, science, or history. Previously, he worked as a cell phone salesman. At one time he lived with his then girlfriend while she paid for the bills (he admits it on his interview with Laura Ingraham). He even lived in her basement... at her expense of course. Cutler started his adventures in atheism by spamming websites with ads for atheist organizations. Other than that, Cutler never had a formal education. But he does have a child out of wedlock, which he does not have full custody of. He has claimed that his nipples refute the existence of God.

Kelly - Kelly's full name is Kelly O'Connor. She use to be a stripper at a strip-joint called the "Bada-Bing!" She is a college drop out and does not have full custody of her three sons. That's three sons! Before she dropped out of school and did lap-dances, Kelly was studying psychology and philosophy. She is now the girlfriend of Brian Cutler.

Rook Hawkins - Rook's real name is unknown. But he has no college degree in philosophy, religion, or history, despite being the so-called "Bible scholar" of RRS. He had claimed he was in the military fighting in the Gulf War which was found to be false. He also wrote an article on the Christ Myth controversy, which was found to be plagiarized. He claimed that his upcoming book was to be published by the Copenhagen series, which was found to be a lie. His so-called "scholarly" mind once claimed that Lucian never mentioned the "cult" of Christianity, which is obviously false. That's just for starters, there's more here. But Rook is known as a lady's man and has given us a taste of his lustful carnality. Well, at least Rook has a high school degree.

So, there you have it folks. Three uneducated people leading a group of gullible atheists. Furthermore, RRS is not a nonprofit organization. Brian Cutler never filed the papers. So, they can do anything they want with the money that is given to them. Since then, Cutler has been known for taking vacations and Kelly has had her breast implants. Perhaps that money came in handy, huh?

Videos that kick RRS' ass!

We've assembled a playlist that exposes the RRS for good. Some of the videos have profanity in it I'm afraid. You see, the RRS managed to piss off atheists too, and well, they had some choice words to say about RRS. But we tried to cover everything (from the blasphemy challenge, to the ABC debate, to the "theism is a mental disorder" fiasco, to their constant bannings from youtube, to Rook Hawkins' failure as a historian, etc.) about the RRS. This is all you need to know really when it comes to RRS. Anyway, this video segment is quite long so sit back and relax:



=======================

* - The information we found on these three evolved monkeys was done through our research or by the reserach of Radar Magazine (which RRS oddly recommends their viewers to read).